hide battle stats on world of warships forum

The railway would also provide better logistical supplies.

Staying with transport Rail connections should cause greater internal migration to places where there is a profitable demand for it, for example, in a remote uninhabited province, we are building factories but there are thousands of workers missing but as we have railway connection with metropolises, some people from metropolises, in search of a better life, go to the other end of the country by rail to take up work and settle down to a greater extent than is the case now.Īnother important element is the supply network for the army and the transfer of the army between the fronts or directly from the conscription centers, namely if the front states are connected to metropolises, then recruits from these metropolises reach the front much faster, if we want to quickly move troops from north to south, then thanks to the rail connection, we do it much faster than without it. economic, for example, for some reason we want to build steel mills in places where there is no iron ore, therefore, in the new update, the prices will differ significantly due to the lack of resource in the state with the iron works, building a Railway on the route between these two places gave a bonus to less the difference in goods due to the fact that the goods would be transported much faster. My proposal is to make the Railway a significant booster in the game in the first place. In the Victorian era, the Railway was a gigantic economic leap, it provided fast transport of people and goods over longer distances and in the event of war it could move masses of soldiers between the fronts like the Germans during World War I.

Namely, we are currently building the railway only to add additional industrialization points to the construction of factories in the numerical statistics, and nothing else. I want to give you my opinion and ideas about the railway.

Hide battle stats on world of warships forum